You know, you always say that, but it's pretty relentless nagging...
You've done a lot of good work, though - just because it feels underwhelming doesn't mean it's not serious progress that's worth recognition. Maybe do as much as the write-up as you can without results while you've got the ball rolling on trying to get a clinical trial? That way if it comes through you just need to do some result write-up, and if it ends up being to cumbersome to get trials you'll have something ready to go with work so far?
As for testing on yourself, I mean, it's less dangerous than testing it without having run trials on mice first, but still. I assume ingredient proportions need to be different between humans and mice, so it might not go right on the first try, plus without the structure and failsafes of a trail you're just asking for trouble.
[...]
You're not honestly considering that as an option, are you?
Ravi/Asher
You've done a lot of good work, though - just because it feels underwhelming doesn't mean it's not serious progress that's worth recognition. Maybe do as much as the write-up as you can without results while you've got the ball rolling on trying to get a clinical trial? That way if it comes through you just need to do some result write-up, and if it ends up being to cumbersome to get trials you'll have something ready to go with work so far?
As for testing on yourself, I mean, it's less dangerous than testing it without having run trials on mice first, but still. I assume ingredient proportions need to be different between humans and mice, so it might not go right on the first try, plus without the structure and failsafes of a trail you're just asking for trouble.
[...]
You're not honestly considering that as an option, are you?